The next act would be Nizar, contesting the court's decision and make an appeal in the Court of Appeal or sue the other guy again in the high court...Here's the chronological events that would follow after this (A loop):
Protests
|
V
Challenge the decision/Sue the other guy again (High court/Court of Appeal/Federal Court)
|
V
One guy kicked out/ One guy became MB
|
V
Protests
|
V
Challenge the decision/Sue the other guy again (High court/Court of Appeal)
|
V
One guy kicked out/ One guy became MB
|
V
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
|
V
Challenge the decision/Sue the other guy again (High court/Court of Appeal/Federal Court)
|
V
One guy kicked out/ One guy became MB
|
V
Protests
|
V
Challenge the decision/Sue the other guy again (High court/Court of Appeal)
|
V
One guy kicked out/ One guy became MB
|
V
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Why can't they dissolve the State Assembly in Perak to allow fresh elections??
Answers: BN knows they will be owned 100% in Perak..They would rather waste all the taxpayers money in a meaningless, useless and unlawful fight instead of giving the people who are the ones paying their salary and all the legal fees in the crisis a chance to select the government officials that truly represent them....isn't that a democratic and the most efficient way to solve the crisis?? Oh wait, our politicians love do things differently.....
Please enlighten me oh great Malaysian politicians, I an a dumb, idiotic fellow who have no idea what the word "Democracy" in Malaysia means ...is it minority rules over the majority? The political parties rules over the people and can do whatever they want with the public funds???? Please correct me if I am wrong, even the great President Obama is afraid of public anger if he messed something up...An our politicians in Malaysia? They just don't give a shit about the voice of the people..so why do we need Democracy for? A show????
Latest story about the Perak Crisis at: Malaysian Insider
No comments:
Post a Comment